15 September 2026
Executive Summary
Some international companies that moved production away from China to reduce exposure to US tariffs are now returning orders to Chinese factories, highlighting an important weakness in supply-chain diversification strategies.
Businesses moved manufacturing into countries including:
- Vietnam.
- India.
- Thailand.
- Cambodia.
- Indonesia.
The strategy was designed partly to reduce tariff exposure and dependence upon China.
But Reuters has identified companies now moving some production back after encountering problems including:
- Higher manufacturing costs.
- Lower productivity.
- Quality-control difficulties.
- Limited supplier networks.
- Shortages of specialist components.
- Longer production times.
Changes in US tariff structures have also reduced some of the financial advantage previously associated with manufacturing elsewhere in Asia.
The result does not represent a wholesale return of manufacturing to China.
Many companies continue to maintain alternative production capacity as protection against future trade disruption.
But the development exposes an important risk-management lesson.
Moving a factory does not automatically move the industrial ecosystem surrounding it.
UK Impact
UK businesses have also spent several years diversifying supply chains away from China.
Those strategies should now be tested for economic as well as geographic resilience.
A supplier in another country may still depend upon China for:
- Components.
- Machinery.
- Tooling.
- Chemicals.
- Electronics.
- Raw materials.
- Engineering expertise.
A product labelled as manufactured in Vietnam, India or elsewhere may therefore retain substantial upstream Chinese dependency.
That matters for:
- Business interruption.
- Political risk.
- Trade-credit exposure.
- Tariff planning.
- Supplier due diligence.
- Inventory strategy.
Global Impact
China’s manufacturing advantage is not based simply upon labour costs.
Many industrial regions contain dense networks of:
- Component suppliers.
- Toolmakers.
- Logistics companies.
- Specialist engineers.
- Raw-material processors.
- Packaging suppliers.
- Ports.
- Warehousing.
Recreating that ecosystem elsewhere can take years.
Businesses that relocated solely on the basis of headline tariff rates may therefore discover that the total cost of production is higher than expected.
There is also another risk.
Returning production entirely to China may solve today’s manufacturing problem while recreating tomorrow’s concentration problem.
Our View
Businesses should distinguish between supplier diversification and genuine supply-chain diversification.
Companies should ask:
- Where is the final product manufactured?
- Where are its critical components manufactured?
- Where does the tooling originate?
- Where do raw materials originate?
- Are alternative factories dependent upon Chinese inputs?
- Are suppliers commercially viable at current volumes?
- Have quality standards been maintained?
- Are production lead times comparable?
- Are tariff savings greater than additional manufacturing costs?
- Could tariff rules change again?
- Are customs origin rules properly understood?
- Is production split between jurisdictions?
- Could one country replace another during disruption?
- Are second-source suppliers actually operational?
- Has diversification been tested rather than assumed?
The lesson is particularly important.
Changing the address of the factory does not necessarily change the underlying supply-chain dependency.
True diversification requires alternative capability, not simply alternative geography.
Risk Indicator: HIGH – CHINA, TARIFFS & SUPPLY-CHAIN CONCENTRATION
Does This Risk Affect Your Business?
Invictus Risk Solutions helps businesses find practical solutions to insurance, risk and commercial challenges.
From individual businesses to major international organisations, risk is our business.
TALK TO INVICTUS →Disclaimer
The information contained within these Market Alerts is provided for general market awareness and informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial, legal, investment, regulatory or insurance advice. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure accuracy at the time of publication using multiple reputable and independently verified sources, geopolitical events, legislation, regulation and market conditions may change rapidly. Readers should obtain appropriate professional advice before acting upon any information contained herein.
Invictus Risk Solutions LLP – Helping organisations stay ahead of emerging risks through informed insight and independent analysis.